119th Congress · AZ-7
District 7, Arizona
Adelita S. Grijalva · Democrat
Directory label from House Clerk MemberData.xml publish-date September 2, 2026. Names are a join, not a scorecard. Roll calls below are raw recorded positions on spending-bill vehicles — not grades. Fundraising is Official · FEC cycle totals, not a scorecard.
Spending-bill roll calls
Making continuing appropriations for fiscal year 2027, and for other purposes
On Passage
National Security, Department of State, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2027
On Passage
Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agency Appropriations Act, 2027
On Passage
Making appropriations for military construction, the Department of Veterans Affairs, and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2027, and for other purposes
On Passage
Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2026
On Passage
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2026
On Motion to Concur in the Senate Amendments
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2026
On Passage
Making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes
On Passage
Financial Services and General Government and National Security, Department of State, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2026
On Passage
Commerce, Justice, Science; Energy and Water Development; and Interior and Environment Appropriations Act, 2026
On Passage
Continuing Appropriations and Extensions Act, 2026
On Motion to Concur in the Senate Amendment
Fundraising (FEC)
Cycle 2025–2026 principal-committee totals and independent expenditures (Schedule E). Official · FEC. Not a scorecard — no donor grades or fundraising ranks.
Official · FEC
FEC candidate ID H6AZ07121.
| Receipts | $2,285,639 |
|---|---|
| Disbursements | $1,857,663 |
| Cash on hand | $427,977 |
| Debts owed | $0 |
Committee: LA GENTE FOR GRIJALVA (C00901116)
Coverage through Jul 1, 2026.
Independent expenditures — Support
Total $662,817
- $231,000SupportWORKING FAMILIES PARTY PAC
- $221,250SupportPROGRESSIVE PROMISE
- $80,000SupportCongressional Progressive Caucus PAC
- $60,027SupportLCV Victory Fund
- $34,525SupportAmerica's Future Project PAC
- $20,000SupportMedicare For All
- $10,000SupportVote Nurses Values Political Action Committee: California Nurses Association
- $6,015SupportVOTAR ES PODER PAC
Independent expenditures — Oppose
Total $195,587
- $195,587OpposeTucson Families Fed Up PAC
Search 119th districts by state + number, GEOID, or member name. Names are a House Clerk directory join — not a scorecard.
- No 119th district matches.
Residence indicators
ACS counts people and households at usual residence. These are Official published CD series — not workplace output. Rank is among 435 voting districts (1 = highest value); DC and Puerto Rico are non-voting / n/a. Higher vs lower “better” depends on the indicator and is not a partisan score.
Residence (household)
Median household income
$60,932
USD, 2024 inflation-adjusted dollars
Official · published CD series
ACS household income describes households at their usual residence. It is not a workplace or commuter measure.
A higher median household income is generally better for resident households. Rank 1 is the highest value among 435 voting districts — not a member score.
Residence (person)
Poverty rate
17.2%
Percent of people for whom poverty status is determined
Official · published CD series
ACS poverty status is a residence concept: people are counted where they usually live. Rate = B17001 below-poverty / universe.
A lower poverty rate is generally better. Rank 1 is the highest rate (descriptive), not the “best” district.
Residence (person)
Unemployment rate
5.4%
Percent of the civilian labor force (population 16 years and over)
Official · published CD series
ACS employment status is a residence concept. Unemployment rate = unemployed / civilian labor force (B23025).
A lower unemployment rate is generally better. Rank 1 is the highest rate (descriptive), not the “best” district.
Residence (person)
Employment–population ratio
55.1%
Percent of the population 16 years and over that is employed
Official · published CD series
ACS employment–population ratio is employed / population 16+ at usual residence (B23025). Not a workplace count.
A higher employment–population ratio is generally better for resident employment. Rank 1 is the highest value among 435 voting districts — not a member score.
Workplace indicators
CBP is Official workplace / establishment data. Allocated GDP is Estimated · allocated from BEA county totals — never official BEA district GDP. Workplace ranks are descriptive volume, not grades.
Workplace / establishment
Establishments (CBP)
13,985
Establishments with paid employees, all NAICS sectors
Official · published CD series
County Business Patterns counts employer establishments where they are located. Numbered districts omit statewide (unallocated) establishments. Not a residence measure.
More establishments means a larger workplace footprint, not a grade. Rank 1 is the highest published CBP count among 435 voting districts.
Workplace / establishment
Employment (CBP)
244,906
Paid employees during the week of March 12, all NAICS sectors
Official · published CD series
CBP employment is a workplace / establishment count (week of March 12). Noise flags from the source workbook are shown on hover. Not a residence labor-force measure.
Higher CBP employment is more paid workplace jobs, not a welfare or partisan score. Rank 1 is the highest value among 435 voting districts.
Workplace / establishment
Annual payroll (CBP)
$13,129,023,000
USD, annual payroll of employer establishments (all sectors)
Official · published CD series
CBP annual payroll is a workplace / establishment total (published in $1,000s; shown in dollars). Noise flags from the source workbook are shown on hover. Not household income.
Higher payroll is more establishment wages, not household income. Rank 1 is the highest value among 435 voting districts.
Workplace / establishment
Allocated GDP (estimate)
$202,201,670,897
USD, current dollars
Estimated · allocated
Estimated allocation of BEA county GDP to 119th districts. Not an official BEA GDP-by-congressional-district series. Residence (ACS) and workplace concepts stay labeled separately.
Higher allocated GDP is more estimated workplace output, not official BEA district GDP and not a member score. Rank 1 is the highest estimate among 435 voting districts.